Well-known fact incoming: the first season of RuPaul’s Drag Race Down Under was a bit of a flop. From the non-existent budget to the racist scandals and the bizarre acts of favouritism, there’s a reason why it’s often placed last in rankings and retrospective reviews. While season two of the Australasian spin-off still lacked polish in the production department, it marked a significant improvement over its predecessor thanks to the charisma, uniqueness, nerve and talent of the cast, fairer judging and powerhouse top three. It felt like a true rudemption for the series and we were optimistic that season three would continue this uptick in quality. Wrong! Season three premiered on 28 July and introduced 10 more queens, who – as per – will compete in a variety of challenges and lip-sync smackdowns to earn the title of ‘Down Under’s Next Drag Superstar’ and $50,000 cash prize. Although this cast (Down Under’s most diverse so far) gave us life with their shady antics, they were let down by various production-related injustices. Here’s what went wrong in this chaotic premiere:

The werkroom:

It’s season three and the queens are still competing in a shed. Seriously, where is the budget? Where? We know this franchise hath the doohallz: look at the werkrooms for recent Drag Race iterations such as France, Philippines and Mexico. World of Wonder signed off on football stadiums, essentially, for each of these spin-offs in their first season, yet the cast of a RuPaul-hosted show in its third season are still confined to a cubicle. We don’t know who Roople has upset in Australasia, but the werkroom is in dire need of an upgrade. No wonder Amyl forgot her entrance line: she was insulted, dumbfounded and traumatised (too much hyperbole?) at the lack of glow-up. The werkroom isn’t the only aspect of production that viewers took issue with. One Reddit user said, “I really thought being the third season, they would’ve stepped up the production side of things. But the lighting is still so rough and inconsistent.” Another criticised the audio, saying Michelle Visage’s feedback from the panel sounded “like it was recorded in her hotel bathroom”. We don’t disagree.